DentalArticle
HIPAA and Dental Marketing: The Rules in Plain English
What HIPAA's marketing rule says, who it binds and where dental practices get caught: review replies, patient photos, testimonials and tracking tools, including exactly what the 2024 court ruling changed.
On this page
HIPAA's marketing rule says a covered entity must obtain a patient's authorization before using or disclosing protected health information for marketing, with two narrow exceptions. For a dental practice, the everyday risks sit in three places: replies to online reviews, patient photos and stories, and tracking tools on booking pages. This article sets out what each rule says, who it binds and when it took effect, with the source for each.
The short answer
Direct answer
HIPAA requires a covered entity to obtain a patient's authorization before using or disclosing protected health information for marketing, except for face-to-face communications and promotional gifts of nominal value. HHS has penalized dental practices over patient details disclosed in replies to online reviews, and its tracking guidance still covers booking pages, business associates and cookie banners after a 2024 court ruling.
What HIPAA calls marketing
Direct answer
HIPAA's Privacy Rule defines marketing as a communication about a product or service that encourages the people who receive it to purchase or use that product or service. The definition is in 45 CFR 164.501, and the rule binds HIPAA covered entities. When a communication fits the definition, the authorization rule in 45 CFR 164.508 applies unless one of its exceptions does.
In the regulation's words, marketing is a communication about a product or service that "encourages recipients of the communication to purchase or use the product or service" [1]. Put each patient-facing promotion through that test with your counsel before it goes out: a whitening offer emailed to your patient list, a recall message that also promotes a new service, or a social post that features a patient. Read 45 CFR 164.501 in full; this article quotes only its core sentence.
When HIPAA requires a patient's authorization
Direct answer
Under 45 CFR 164.508(a)(3), a covered entity must obtain an authorization for any use or disclosure of protected health information for marketing. The rule names two exceptions: a face-to-face communication, and a promotional gift of nominal value. Where a third party pays for the communication, the authorization must state that such payment is involved [2]. Counsel should draft the form from the regulation's text.
The exceptions are narrow, and a disclosure can reach well beyond the practice's own channels. In one of four enforcement actions HHS announced on March 28, 2022, Northcutt Dental-Fairhope in Alabama disclosed patient information "to a campaign manager and a third-party marketing company" hired for a state senate election campaign, and agreed to pay $62,500 [3]. Anyone outside the practice who receives patient information for promotion belongs in that conversation with counsel.
Replying to reviews without disclosing anything
Direct answer
A reply to a review can itself be a disclosure. HHS's Office for Civil Rights imposed a $50,000 civil money penalty on a North Carolina dental practice that disclosed a patient's information in reply to a negative online review, and New Vision Dental in California paid $23,000 over disclosures made when responding to negative reviews. The ADA advises replying only in broad "all patient" terms.
OCR's director put it plainly when announcing the New Vision Dental settlement on December 14, 2022: providers cannot disclose patients' protected health information when responding to negative online reviews. "This is a clear NO." [4] It is not only dentists: Manasa Health Center, a New Jersey psychiatric practice, paid $30,000 after posting a response to a patient's negative online review that disclosed the patient's information [5].
The American Dental Association's guidance on negative reviews gives the safe pattern: respond "in very broad 'all patient' terms", invite anyone who wants to discuss their experience to contact the office directly, and "Never reference a specific person or incident." [6] That means no "as your dentist", no treatment details and no dates of visits.
Asking for reviews and using testimonials
Direct answer
Three sets of rules meet here. The FTC's rule on consumer reviews, in force since October 21, 2024, bans fake reviews, incentives tied to a positive or negative review, undisclosed reviews by officers and managers, and review suppression through threats. Google bans any incentive for a review and asking only happy customers. The ADA says staff should not post reviews of their own practice.
The FTC's rule is 16 CFR Part 465, published at 89 FR 68034 on August 22, 2024, and it binds businesses [7][8]. It also bans company-controlled "independent" review sites and "fake indicators of social media influence" [8]. FTC staff say the rule does not ban incentives that carry no sentiment condition, and that asking only happy customers, while not specifically banned by the rule, "could violate the FTC Act" [9]. Google's policy is stricter: merchants may not offer incentives "in exchange for posting any review" or selectively solicit positive reviews [10].
The ADA adds that it is "generally and strongly recommended" that practices not pay for online reviews, and notes that some jurisdictions may prohibit soliciting online reviews by patients [11]. Check your state board's rules before you build a review program; our guides on how to get Google reviews and whether Google reviews help SEO cover the rest.
Testimonials are endorsements. The FTC's Endorsement Guides, updated June 29, 2023, are guidance under the FTC Act rather than a rule. They say a testimonial will likely be read as representing what consumers will generally achieve, and that advertisers "should not take actions that have the effect of distorting" what consumers think [12][13]. The ADA Code, 2025 edition, which binds ADA members, treats statements "likely to create an unjustified expectation about results" as misleading [14].
Photos, social media and case stories
Direct answer
Treat a recognizable patient photo as patient information. HIPAA lists "full face photographic images and any comparable images" among its identifiers, and its marketing rule requires authorization before protected health information is used for marketing. We found no HHS statement on marketing photos specifically, so treat before-and-after posts, case stories and posts that tag patients as questions for counsel first.
Before-and-after photos also carry an FTC meaning. The Endorsement Guides give the example of an ad that simply features "before" and "after" pictures: it "is likely to convey that the endorser's experience is representative" [13]. Pick results you would call typical.
Social media now has its own line in the ADA Code. Since the 2025 edition, announced February 24, 2025, unsupported claims of safety, efficacy or superiority are misleading whether made "in print or digital via social media or via a dental influencer", and anyone endorsing a product or service "must disclose any paid partnerships with vendors" [14].
Website tracking: what the 2024 ruling changed
Direct answer
On June 20, 2024, a federal court in Texas vacated one position in HHS's tracking bulletin: that HIPAA obligations are triggered when a tool connects a visitor's IP address with a visit to an unauthenticated public page about specific health conditions or providers. HHS did not appeal. The bulletin's guidance on authenticated pages, booking pages, business associates and cookie banners remains.
The bulletin is "Use of Online Tracking Technologies by HIPAA Covered Entities and Business Associates", issued by HHS's Office for Civil Rights in December 2022 and revised on March 18, 2024 [15]. The case is American Hospital Association v. Becerra, No. 4:23-cv-1110, in the Northern District of Texas. The court said its vacatur should not be construed as limiting "the legal operability of other guidance" in the HHS document [16], and the AHA reported on August 29, 2024 that HHS would not appeal [17].
What the bulletin still says:
- "Tracking technologies on a regulated entity's user-authenticated webpages generally have access to PHI." [15]
- Pages where people schedule appointments without logging in may have access to PHI in certain circumstances; then the tracking vendor is a business associate and "a BAA is required" [15].
- Cookie banners "do not constitute a valid HIPAA authorization" [15].
- Disclosing PHI to tracking vendors for marketing without HIPAA-compliant authorizations "would constitute impermissible disclosures" [15].
Regulators have warned about this before. On July 20, 2023, the FTC and HHS wrote to about 130 hospital systems and telehealth providers about technologies such as the Meta/Facebook pixel and Google Analytics; dentists were not among the recipients [18]. The FTC has also moved against health data flowing to advertising platforms outside dentistry, with proposed orders against BetterHelp ($7.8 million, March 2, 2023) and Cerebral (April 15, 2024) [19][20]. For the site setup itself, see our list of dental website must-haves.
Checklist: before anything patient-related goes public
Frequently asked questions
What does HIPAA say about replying to a Google review?
OCR has treated patient details in a public reply as a disclosure of protected health information. It imposed a $50,000 penalty on a North Carolina dental practice over a reply to a negative online review, and New Vision Dental paid $23,000 [3][4]. The ADA suggests broad "all patient" wording and never referencing a specific person or incident [6]. Thank the reviewer and offer a private conversation instead.
Does HIPAA cover patient photos in marketing?
HIPAA lists full-face photographs and comparable images among its identifiers [21], and its marketing rule requires authorization before a covered entity uses protected health information for marketing [2]. We found no HHS statement on marketing photos specifically, so connecting the two is a reading of the rules, not an HHS ruling. Ask counsel before a patient's face or story appears in an ad, a post or on your website.
Is Google Analytics HIPAA compliant?
No analytics tool carries a HIPAA approval; what matters is the agreements in place, the configuration and how the data is used. HHS's bulletin says trackers on user-authenticated pages generally have access to protected health information, and booking pages may too; where they do, the vendor is a business associate and an agreement is required [15]. The FTC and HHS named Google Analytics in their 2023 letter to hospitals and telehealth providers [18].
What is a HIPAA marketing authorization?
It is the patient authorization that 45 CFR 164.508 requires before a covered entity uses or discloses protected health information for marketing. The rule's two named exceptions are face-to-face communications and promotional gifts of nominal value, and where a third party pays for the communication, the authorization must state that payment is involved [2]. Have counsel draft the form against the regulation's text.
Did the court strike down HHS's tracking guidance?
Only one part of it. The June 20, 2024 ruling in American Hospital Association v. Becerra vacated the position that an IP address plus a visit to an unauthenticated public page about specific health conditions or providers triggers HIPAA [16]. The court said its ruling should not be read as limiting the rest of the guidance, and HHS did not appeal [16][17]. The sections on portals, booking pages, business associates and cookie banners remain.
Market the practice, not the patient
Strong dental marketing needs no patient details: it needs pages that answer questions, a complete Business Profile and genuine reviews collected within the rules. That is the work behind our dental SEO and our first page guarantee, offered after an assessment for a phrase list agreed in writing, with its written terms measuring the share on page one separately in each of the three places: the map results, the organic results and Google's AI answers. More channels are in our dental marketing strategies guide, and a free SEO audit shows where your practice stands.
This is general information, not legal advice.
Sources
- 45 CFR 164.501, via Cornell Legal Information Institute, accessed 2026-09-27 www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/164.501
- 45 CFR 164.508, via Cornell Legal Information Institute, accessed 2026-09-27 www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/164.508
- US Department of Health and Human Services, "Four HIPAA Enforcement Actions Hold Healthcare Providers Accountable With Compliance", March 28, 2022 (Internet Archive capture of 2024-11-27) www.hhs.gov/about/news/2022/03/28/four-hipaa-enforcement-actions-hold-healthcare-providers-accountable-with-compliance.html
- US Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, news release on the New Vision Dental settlement, December 14, 2022 (Internet Archive capture of 2024-11-27) www.hhs.gov/about/news/2022/12/14/hhs-civil-rights-office-enters-settlement-with-dental-practice-over-disclosures-of-patients-protected-health-information.html
- US Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Manasa Health Center resolution agreement, June 5, 2023 (Internet Archive capture of 2026-08-10) www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/agreements/manasa/index.html
- American Dental Association, "Negative Online Reviews", undated www.ada.org/resources/practice/practice-management/35_socialmedia_negativereviews
- Federal Register, final rule on the use of consumer reviews and testimonials (89 FR 68034), August 22, 2024 www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/08/22/2024-18519/trade-regulation-rule-on-the-use-of-consumer-reviews-and-testimonials
- 16 CFR 465.2 to 465.8, via Cornell Legal Information Institute, accessed 2026-09-27 www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/465.2
- US FTC, "Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule: Questions and Answers", November 2024 www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/consumer-reviews-testimonials-rule-questions-answers
- Google, "Prohibited & restricted content", live policy (accessed 2026-09-27) support.google.com/contributionpolicy/answer/7400114?hl=en
- American Dental Association, "Online Reviews", reviewed February 28, 2025 www.ada.org/resources/practice/practice-management/34_socialmedia_onlinereviews
- US FTC, press release announcing the updated Endorsement Guides (16 CFR Part 255), June 29, 2023 www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/06/federal-trade-commission-announces-updated-advertising-guides-combat-deceptive-reviews-endorsements
- 16 CFR 255.2, via Cornell Legal Information Institute, accessed 2026-09-27 www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/255.2
- American Dental Association, "Principles of Ethics & Code of Professional Conduct" (2025 edition, advisory opinions revised to October 2024), announced February 24, 2025 www.ada.org/-/media/project/ada-organization/ada/ada-org/files/about/2025_code_of_ethics_full.pdf
- US Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, "Use of Online Tracking Technologies by HIPAA Covered Entities and Business Associates", December 2022, revised March 18, 2024 (Internet Archive capture of 2026-09-04) www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/hipaa-online-tracking/index.html
- US District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Judge Pittman), "American Hospital Association v. Becerra", No. 4:23-cv-1110, June 20, 2024 caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-n-d-tex-for-wor-div/116301785.html
- American Hospital Association, news item reporting that HHS will not appeal the online tracking ruling, August 29, 2024 www.aha.org/news/headline/2024-08-29-hhs-will-not-appeal-aha-court-victory-online-tracking-case
- US FTC, "FTC and HHS Warn Hospital Systems and Telehealth Providers about Privacy and Security Risks from Online Tracking Technologies", July 20, 2023 www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/07/ftc-hhs-warn-hospital-systems-telehealth-providers-about-privacy-security-risks-online-tracking
- US FTC, press release on the proposed order against BetterHelp, March 2, 2023 www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/03/ftc-ban-betterhelp-revealing-consumers-data-including-sensitive-mental-health-information-facebook
- US FTC, press release on the proposed order against Cerebral, April 15, 2024 www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/proposed-ftc-order-will-prohibit-telehealth-firm-cerebral-using-or-disclosing-sensitive-data
- 45 CFR 164.514, via Cornell Legal Information Institute, accessed 2026-09-27 www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/164.514

